Customer is planning to upgrade from DS3.2 to DS4.X
but the result from DS4.1 testing and gathering information, the quality was not good and they are considering of DS4.2.
However, quality of DS4.2 is still yet unknown.
Would you give me the opinion for below?
1. Is it OK to think the quality of DS4.2 will be better than DS4.1 ?
(assume the released version for the end of this year)
DS4.1 patch4 still had a bug that schedule cannot be created and this situation makes me think it is released without testing.
* This bug is solved in patch5.
2. Below problems which we recognize in DS4.1 are solved?
- Fall of the response of Build-in function
Heard response decline for most of the Build-in function.
3. They do not require any of the additional function in DS4.1 and 4.2.
Therefore, they want to go-live in stable (including continuous support) , spending minimum cost as possible.
In this kind of situation, please give me an advise which version is most appropriate.
If you advise for DS3.2 3.6 to see how it goes,
is it in a level that it’s possible to upgrade to DS3.2 3.6 without testing?
If we need testing, we need to narrow down the testing objects, so give me the list of change points.
Regards,
Hazui